View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Growth Funnel Analysis |  Architecture C4 Model |  Growth A/B Testing |  Architecture arc42 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-4 h | 1-4 Wochen | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 1-5 | 1-6 | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypotheses | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View |
Tagsno overlap | AnalyticsConversionGrowth | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication |