View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Growth Funnel Analysis |  Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses. | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 60-120 min | 15-45 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypotheses | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | AnalyticsConversionGrowth | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |