methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Purposedifferent
When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-4 Wochen1-2 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-51-61-4Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
AsyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypothesesExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summaryArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note
Tagsno overlap
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Add more methods