View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Force Field Analysis |  Facilitation World Café |  Decision Making OODA Loop |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | In dynamic situations, decisions become outdated faster than they can be prepared. The OODA Loop holds observing, orienting, deciding, and acting together as a recurring rhythm so reaction does not slide into inertia. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 60-180 min | 15-60 min je Zyklus | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 12-100+ | 1-8 | 6-50 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Situation Assessment, Decision Loop, Action Updates | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tagsno overlap | ChangeDecisionStrategy | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | DecisionChangeLearningStrategy | LearningDialogueFacilitation |