View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Force Field Analysis |  Operations Gemba Walk |  Product Strategy DIBB |  Operations A3 Problem Solving |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30-120 min | 1-2 h | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 2-6 | 2-8 | 2-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis |
Tagsno overlap | ChangeDecisionStrategy | LeanObservationProcessOperations | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations |