methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Anonymous individual judgments pass through feedback loops to form a distribution.
Decision Making
Delphi Method
Paper illustration for Evaporating Cloud.
Systems Thinking
Evaporating Cloud
Paper illustration of Leverage Points with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Leverage Points
Purposedifferent
In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together.The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict.Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighMediumHigh
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-4 Wochen60-120 minHalf day
Participantsdifferent
3-126-30 Experten2-83-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk NotesExpert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption NotesConflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next ExperimentsLeverage Map, Action Strategy
Tagsno overlap
ChangeDecisionStrategy
ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy
Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking
Systems thinkingChangeStrategy
Add more methods