View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Failure Mode and Effects AnalysisSpecification by ExampleROAM BoardAcceptance Criteria Workshop
| Criterion |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Agile Specification by Example |  Agile ROAM Board |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | 60-90 min pro Feature | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 20-40 min pro Story |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-6 | 3-15 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | ROAM Board, Owner List | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update |
Tagsno overlap | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development |