View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Failure Mode and Effects AnalysisROAM BoardSpecification by ExampleAcceptance Criteria Workshop
| Criterion |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Agile ROAM Board |  Agile Specification by Example |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 60-90 min pro Feature | 20-40 min pro Story |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-15 | 3-6 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | ROAM Board, Owner List | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update |
Tagsno overlap | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development |