View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Failure Mode and Effects AnalysisCompetency QuestionsThree AmigosAcceptance Criteria Workshop
| Criterion |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Knowledge Modeling Competency Questions |  Agile Three Amigos |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | 2-4 h | 15-30 min | 20-40 min pro Story |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 2-8 | 3 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Competency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage Matrix | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update |
Tagsno overlap | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development |