View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Failure Mode and Effects AnalysisCATWOE AnalysisTheory of Constraints Thinking ProcessCurrent Reality Tree
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis | ![]() Systems Thinking CATWOE Analysis | ![]() Systems Thinking Theory of Constraints Thinking Process | ![]() Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way. | The Theory of Constraints Thinking Process exposes a system's bottleneck and the logic behind it. It suits situations where many symptoms trace back to the same limiting relationship. | A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | High | High |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | 45-90 min | 0.5-3 Tage | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-8 | 4-10 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | CATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, Constraints | Current Reality Logic, Conflict Cloud, Future Reality Tree, Implementation Obstacles | Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders | Theory of ConstraintsConstraintsSystems thinkingCausality | Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality |



