methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration of an assumption matrix with prioritized test cards
Decision Making
Assumption Surfacing
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Kepner-Tregoe
Operations
Kepner-Tregoe
Purposedifferent
For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a disturbance that's hard to pin down, the method cleanly separates problem, cause, and decision. It reduces mixing when symptoms allow several interpretations.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowHigh
Timedifferent
2-6 h45-90 min10-20 min daily2-8 h
Participantsdifferent
3-102-812-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsAssumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning PlanDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesProblem Analysis, Decision Analysis, Risk Plan
Tagsno overlap
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Problem solvingRoot causeDecisionOperations
Add more methods