methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Architecture Inception Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Architecture Inception Canvas
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Purposedifferent
For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
2-6 h1-2 h15-30 min1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
3-103-82-63-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsInception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open QuestionsRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action Plan
Tagsno overlap
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
AlignmentArchitectureCanvas
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
Add more methods