methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Flywheel.
Growth
Flywheel
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Purposedifferent
Growth often breaks down where a reinforcing mechanism builds up too much friction. A Flywheel shows the cycle of value, repetition, and reinforcement meant to sustain growth.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighLow
Timedifferent
60-120 minHalf day initial, dann laufend1-4 Wochen1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
3-8Ein Team plus Stakeholder1-6Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Flywheel Map, Friction Points, Growth Levers, Experiment BacklogTeam API DocumentExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summaryInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note
Tagsno overlap
GrowthRetentionConversion
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Add more methods