methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Flywheel.
Growth
Flywheel
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration of Hooked Model with its method-specific working model.
Growth
Hooked Model
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Purposedifferent
Growth often breaks down where a reinforcing mechanism builds up too much friction. A Flywheel shows the cycle of value, repetition, and reinforcement meant to sustain growth.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.The Hooked Model helps clarify engagement loops, user behavior, and experiments. It makes repeat behavior measurable and captures the result as a hooked loop, trigger map, and reward design.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
60-120 min5-15 minMultiple workshops over several weeks60-120 min
Participantsdifferent
3-83-202-85-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Flywheel Map, Friction Points, Growth Levers, Experiment BacklogRanked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistHooked loop, Trigger map, Reward design, Ethics checkRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority
Tagsno overlap
GrowthRetentionConversion
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
GrowthBehaviorRetention
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
Add more methods