methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Flywheel.
Growth
Flywheel
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Paper illustration for PDCA Cycle.
Operations
PDCA Cycle
Paper illustration of a calm four-quadrant Assumption Map with hypothesis cards and emphasis on important assumptions with little evidence.
Product Discovery
Assumption Mapping
Purposedifferent
Growth often breaks down where a reinforcing mechanism builds up too much friction. A Flywheel shows the cycle of value, repetition, and reinforcement meant to sustain growth.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode.When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowMedium
Timedifferent
60-120 min1-4 Wochen1 h bis mehrere Wochen45-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-81-61-82-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Flywheel Map, Friction Points, Growth Levers, Experiment BacklogExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summaryPDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard ChangeAssumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking
Tagsno overlap
GrowthRetentionConversion
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
Continuous improvementLeanExperiments
AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation
Add more methods