View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion | ![]() Product Discovery Test Card | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test | ![]() Product Discovery Learning Card |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 20-35 min | 1-5 Tage | 25-40 min |
Participantsdifferent | 8-80 | 1-5 | Nutzertraffic | 1-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Test Card with a pre-set threshold | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Learning Card with evidence and next action |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning |



