View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Agile Starfish Retrospective |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 45–75 min | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | 8-80 | 4-12 | Team members involved | 6-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | LearningDialogueFacilitation |