methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion
Paper illustration for Root Cause Tree Analysis
Operations
Root Cause Tree Analysis
Paper illustration for World Café.
Facilitation
World Café
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Purposedifferent
When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover.For a problem with several suspected causes, the method builds a causal structure instead of a mere list. It makes visible how causes connect and where the strongest points of leverage lie.When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-3 h60-180 min1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
8-802-812-100+3-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up QuestionsCause Tree, Evidence Notes, CountermeasuresTable Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared QuestionsProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action Plan
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationDialogueLarge group
Root causeTreeIncidentQuality
FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
Add more methods