methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Paper illustration for World Café.
Facilitation
World Café
Paper illustration of many question cards around one challenge
Facilitation
Question Burst
Purposedifferent
When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover.Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity.When a problem gets covered up too quickly with answers, Question Burst puts the better question at the center. The format opens the thinking space before the group commits to an interpretation.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min10-20 min je Frage60-180 min15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
8-806-5012-100+2-8
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up QuestionsConcept Questions, Vote Results, Learning NotesTable Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared QuestionsQuestion List, Reframed Challenge, Learning Prompts
Tags1 shared
FacilitationDialogueLarge group
LearningDialogueFacilitation
FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking
QuestionsReframingFacilitationSensemaking
Add more methods