methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Paper illustration of many question cards around one challenge
Facilitation
Question Burst
Paper illustration for Open Space Technology.
Facilitation
Open Space Technology
Purposedifferent
When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover.Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.When a problem gets covered up too quickly with answers, Question Burst puts the better question at the center. The format opens the thinking space before the group commits to an interpretation.When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowHigh
Timedifferent
45-90 min10-20 min je Frage15-30 min0.5-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
8-806-502-820-500+
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up QuestionsConcept Questions, Vote Results, Learning NotesQuestion List, Reframed Challenge, Learning PromptsSession Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics
Tags1 shared
FacilitationDialogueLarge group
LearningDialogueFacilitation
QuestionsReframingFacilitationSensemaking
FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy
Add more methods