View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Innovation Lotus Blossom |  Facilitation Open Space Technology |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When a central question feels too large, the method breaks it into neighboring topic fields with their own depth of ideation. It holds structure and openness at the same time, so adjacent perspectives don't get lost. This grows an idea space out of a core problem. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 8-80 | 3-10 | 20-500+ |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Lotus Diagram, Idea Themes, Shortlist | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityDivergenceWorkshop | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
