View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |  UX Design Lean UX Canvas |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | The Lean UX Canvas helps clarify user behavior, touchpoints, and concept decisions. It makes assumptions and desired outcomes visible and captures the result as a completed canvas, hypothesis list, and first experiment. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-3 Wochen | 2-3 h | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 8-80 | 5-12 Interviews | 3-8 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Completed Lean UX Canvas, Hypothesis list, First experiment | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | CanvasHypothesisOutcomesDiscovery | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds |