View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-5 Tage | 10-20 min je Frage | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 8-80 | Nutzertraffic | 6-50 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | LearningDialogueFacilitation | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |