methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Paper illustration of a Learning Card with four fields for hypothesis, observation, insight, and action.
Product Discovery
Learning Card
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
Purposedifferent
When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible.When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-5 Tage25-40 min45-75 min
Participantsdifferent
8-80Nutzertraffic1-52-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up QuestionsClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning DecisionLearning Card with evidence and next actionTest Matrix, Test Plan
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationDialogueLarge group
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions
Add more methods