View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Product Discovery Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When many hypotheses compete for attention, it brings order to their learning sequence and importance. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritization canvas and a hypothesis backlog. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-5 Tage | 60-90 min | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 8-80 | Nutzertraffic | 3-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Prioritization Canvas, Hypothesis Backlog | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | ExperimentsPrioritizationDiscoveryHypothesis | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |