View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Agile Example Mapping |  Facilitation Barcamp |  Agile Specification by Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30-60 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 60-90 min pro Feature |
Participantsdifferent | 8-80 | 3-7 | 15-200 | 3-6 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Example Table, Acceptance Tests |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development |