View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion | ![]() Innovation Crazy 8s | ![]() Facilitation World Café | ![]() Innovation Rapid Ideation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | When a decision needs to be prepared quickly, the method generates many solution-close variants in a short time. It deliberately relies on pace to undercut self-censorship and perfectionism. This quickly produces a usable field for prioritization and further work. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 8-15 min | 60-180 min | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 8-80 | 1-10 | 12-100+ | 1-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Ideenpool, Roh-Shortlist, Cluster |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | BrainstormingIdeationDivergenceSpeed |



