View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Innovation Crazy 8s |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |  Innovation Rapid Ideation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When a decision needs to be prepared quickly, the method generates many solution-close variants in a short time. It deliberately relies on pace to undercut self-censorship and perfectionism. This quickly produces a usable field for prioritization and further work. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 8-15 min | 10-20 min | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 8-80 | 1-10 | 4-100+ | 1-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Ideenpool, Roh-Shortlist, Cluster |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | BrainstormingIdeationDivergenceSpeed |