View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research First-click Testing | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Facilitation Power Interest Grid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 60–90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-30 | 2-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Click Heatmap, Success Rate, Design Recommendations | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder |
Tagsno overlap | UXNavigationFindabilityValidation | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning |



