methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration of two people facing each other, speech bubbles and an open interview notebook.
UX Research
User Interviews
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage30-60 min je Interview30–60 min per interview1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
10-305-12 Interviews1 participant per interviewNutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Click Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsInterview Notes, Themes, Insight SummaryClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods