methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration for Opportunity Interview
Product Discovery
Opportunity Interview
Paper illustration for Concierge MVP
Product Discovery
Concierge MVP
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Purposedifferent
When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities.When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage30-60 min je Interview1-4 Wochen30-60 min je Interview
Participantsdifferent
10-305-12 Interviews3-10 Kunden5-12 Interviews
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Click Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsInterview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer QuotesConcierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP RisksProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments
Tagsno overlap
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer
MVPValidationServiceDiscovery
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
Add more methods