methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration of a JTBD interview notebook with a decision timeline, forces of change and a concise job hypothesis.
Product Discovery
Jobs to Be Done
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Paper illustration of Opportunity Scoring with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Opportunity Scoring
Purposedifferent
When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-3 Wochen30-60 min je Interview60-120 min
Participantsdifferent
10-305-12 Interviews5-10 Interviews3-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Click Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsJob Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity ListSolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesOpportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes
Tagsno overlap
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
CustomerOutcomesNeeds
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds
Add more methods