methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Paper illustration for Soft Systems Methodology.
Systems Thinking
Soft Systems Methodology
Purposedifferent
When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-3 h60-180 min0.5-3 Tage
Participantsdifferent
10-302-84-205-15
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Click Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsIssue Map, Positions, Argument NotesCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking NotesRich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change Agenda
Tagsno overlap
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking
Add more methods