methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Empathy Mapping
UX Research
Empathy Mapping
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage45-90 min30–60 min15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
10-302-54-82-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Click Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisEmpathy Map, Assumptions List, Research GapsRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods