View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique | ![]() Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes | ![]() Team Design Spotify Model Mapping | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-60 min | Half day | 90-180 min | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1 | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 5-15 | Team members involved |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | Spotify Model Map, Action List | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |



