methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Feynman Technique.
Knowledge Modeling
Feynman Technique
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Purposedifferent
The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
20-60 min30-60 min15-30 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
13-122-63-10
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study NotesStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement ActionsRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresEmotion Board, Themes, Action Items
Tagsno overlap
LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
Add more methods