View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |  Facilitation Open Space Technology |  Facilitation World Café |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 20-60 min | 0.5-2 Tage | 60-180 min | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | 1 | 20-500+ | 12-100+ | 6-50 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tagsno overlap | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | LearningDialogueFacilitation |