methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Feynman Technique.
Knowledge Modeling
Feynman Technique
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Purposedifferent
The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
20-60 min30-120 min30-60 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
12-63-123-10
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study NotesObservation Notes, Improvement IdeasStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement ActionsEmotion Board, Themes, Action Items
Tagsno overlap
LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding
LeanObservationProcessOperations
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
Add more methods