methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Feynman Technique.
Knowledge Modeling
Feynman Technique
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Purposedifferent
The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
20-60 min30-120 min45–75 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
12-6Team members involved3-12
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study NotesObservation Notes, Improvement Ideas4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding
LeanObservationProcessOperations
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
Add more methods