methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Paper illustration for Time Blocking
Operations
Time Blocking
Paper illustration of Barrier Analysis with its method-specific working model.
Operations
Barrier Analysis
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.With a calendar that grows on request, the method makes available time explicit again. It combines appointments, focus work, and buffer into a more realistic day structure.For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
2-6 h15-30 min Planung, laufend2-4 h10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
3-812-61
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control ActionsBlocked Calendar, Capacity View, Focus PlanBarrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action BacklogDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
RiskRoot causeSafety
PlanningTime managementFocus
Root causeSafetyIncident
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods