methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Paper illustration for Time Blocking
Operations
Time Blocking
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration of Barrier Analysis with its method-specific working model.
Operations
Barrier Analysis
Purposedifferent
For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.With a calendar that grows on request, the method makes available time explicit again. It combines appointments, focus work, and buffer into a more realistic day structure.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
2-6 h15-30 min Planung, laufend10-20 min daily2-4 h
Participantsdifferent
3-8112-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control ActionsBlocked Calendar, Capacity View, Focus PlanDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesBarrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action Backlog
Tagsno overlap
RiskRoot causeSafety
PlanningTime managementFocus
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeSafetyIncident
Add more methods