View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Fault Tree Analysis | ![]() UX Research Surveys | ![]() Product Discovery Test Card | ![]() Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. | When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal. | The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | 3-14 Tage | 20-35 min | 45-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 50+ | 1-5 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions | Survey Results, Charts, Segment Insights | Test Card with a pre-set threshold | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking |
Tagsno overlap | RiskRoot causeSafety | QuantitativeResearchValidation | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation |



