methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for Causal Factor Analysis.
Operations
Causal Factor Analysis
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Purposedifferent
For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.For an event with a complicated course, the method breaks down the contributing factors along the timeline. It shows how conditions, decisions, and reactions together produce a course of events.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowHighLow
Timedifferent
2-6 h45-90 min2-6 h20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
3-83-103-101-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control ActionsResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsEvent Timeline, Causal Factor Chart, Cause List, Corrective ActionsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes
Tagsno overlap
RiskRoot causeSafety
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
CausalityIncidentRoot causeTimeline
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
Add more methods