View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Fault Tree Analysis | ![]() Agile Bucket System | ![]() Operations MORT Analysis | ![]() Agile Affinity Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. | When a large batch of work needs a fast, rough estimate, it sorts items into predefined size buckets. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a Bucketed Backlog, Relative Estimates, and Split Candidates. | For a safety-relevant event or a system with high protection requirements, the method examines where controls failed. It exposes both technical and organizational gaps. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | 30-90 min | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 3-12 | 2-6 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions | Bucketed Backlog, Relative Estimates, Split Candidates | MORT Worksheets, Findings per Branch, Corrective Actions, Systemic Recommendations | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items |
Tagsno overlap | RiskRoot causeSafety | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | Root causeSafetySystemicIncident | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing |



