View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Fault Tree AnalysisAcceptance Criteria WorkshopFailure Mode and Effects AnalysisExample Mapping
| Criterion |  Operations Fault Tree Analysis |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | 20-40 min pro Story | 2-6 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 3-6 | 3-10 | 3-7 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | RiskRoot causeSafety | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |