View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Family Tree Analysis | ![]() Operations Root Cause Analysis | ![]() Knowledge Modeling NeOn Methodology | ![]() Operations 5 Whys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a series of incidents with a similar pattern, the method arranges individual events as branches of a common origin. It makes visible which conditions keep recurring. | When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another. | The NeOn Methodology structures ontology work as a controlled process with reuse, scenarios, and reviews. It is useful when ontologies should not emerge ad hoc but modularly and reusably. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 1-4 h | Mehrere Wochen bis Monate | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 3-8 | 2-10 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Family Tree Diagram, Pattern Notes, Systemic Measures | Problem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action Plan | Ontology Requirements Specification, Reuse Plan, Ontology Modules, Evaluation Report | Root cause notes, Countermeasures |
Tagsno overlap | Root causePatternsIncidentSystemic | Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident | OntologyMethodologyReuseSemanticEngineering | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving |



