View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Family Tree Analysis |  Agile Example Mapping |  Operations Barrier Analysis |  Agile Specification by Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a series of incidents with a similar pattern, the method arranges individual events as branches of a common origin. It makes visible which conditions keep recurring. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 30-60 min | 2-4 h | 60-90 min pro Feature |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 3-7 | 2-6 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Family Tree Diagram, Pattern Notes, Systemic Measures | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Barrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action Backlog | Example Table, Acceptance Tests |
Tagsno overlap | Root causePatternsIncidentSystemic | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | Root causeSafetyIncident | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development |