View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Architecture Risk Storming |  Product Discovery Experiment Canvas |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. | When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 60-90 min | 30-60 min | 45-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | Nutzertraffic | 4-12 | 1-5 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog | Completed Experiment Canvas, Success Metric | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking |
Tags1 shared | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation |