View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Product Discovery Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When many hypotheses compete for attention, it brings order to their learning sequence and importance. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritization canvas and a hypothesis backlog. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 1-2 h | 60-90 min | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | Nutzertraffic | 4-12 | 3-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Prioritization Canvas, Hypothesis Backlog | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | ExperimentsPrioritizationDiscoveryHypothesis | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |