methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration of Stakeholder Salience Model with its method-specific working model.
Facilitation
Stakeholder Salience Model
Paper illustration for Storytelling
Facilitation
Storytelling
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Purposedifferent
When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy.When an insight needs to have an effect, storytelling translates dry facts into a comprehensible development. It combines context, tension, and consequence into a form that people remember and pass on more easily.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min60-90 min45-120 minHalf day initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
3-123-61-6Ein Team plus Stakeholder
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsSalience Diagram, Strategy per ClassNarrative Outline, Key Message, Story ArcTeam API Document
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance
CommunicationNarrativeStakeholdersFacilitation
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
Add more methods